Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Morrison v. Vandermosten et al
as 4:2019cv01926
Plaintiff:
Billy D. Morrison and Billy Devar Morrison
Defendant:
Laurn Miller, G. Watt, David Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruach El et al v. Chang et al
as 2:2017cv01915
Plaintiff:
Qadim Ruach El, Ameenah Adilah El, S.A EL and others
Defendant:
Susan Chang, Charleston County Department of Social Services, Ajoni Holmes Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacori Carter v. Keith Davi
as 15-6077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACORI ANDRE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH DAVIS, Superintendent/Warden, JOYCETINE BOONE, Assistant Superintendent/Warden, EDWARD CURRY, Correctional Officer and others
Sweeting v. Martin et al
as 2:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Darnell Sweeting
Defendant:
Mr. E. Martin and Mr. R. L. Tuell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Nettles et al
as 6:2014cv03828
Plaintiff:
Garnett R Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
William N Nettles, Angela Lewis, Kimberly Whittle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jacori Andre' Carter
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Joycetine Boone, Edward Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. Mayes et al
as 5:2013ct03076
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Gant
Defendant:
Ronald Mayes, State of North Carolina, Johnnie Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Watson v. J. Tucker
as 12-7624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN A. WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TUCKER, Correctional Officer, W. CAMPBELL, Nurse, MEDICAL OFFICER JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer and others
Hawkins v. Broyk, et al
as 2:2011cv00489
Defendant:
Mr. Broyk, Ms. Boone, Ms. D. Spier and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndrell Demond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Wright, Jr. v. Steven Bunn
as 10-6468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST JAWARREN WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN BUNN, BOBBY E. MARTIN, ROBIN WALKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
