Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CROCKER v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04752
Plaintiff:
SANDIE CROCKER
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv04141
Plaintiff:
Corae Cornelius Harris
Defendant:
Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. and Rich Henderson Toyota Sandy Springs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Kirk CampbellIn re: Kirk Campbell
as 26-12536
Petitioner:
In re: KIRK CAMPBELL
Respondent:
J.M. CELESTE, A. SHICK, ENNIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Kirk CampbellIn re: Kirk Campbell
as 26-12499
Petitioner:
In re: KIRK CAMPBELL
Respondent:
J.M. CELESTE, A. SHICK, ENNIS and others
Jefferey Norman v. Los Angeles Unified School District LAUSD et al
as 5:2026cv03975
Plaintiff:
Jefferey L. Norman
Defendant:
Los Angeles Unified School District LAUSD, United Teachers of Los Angeles UTLA, California Commission on Teacher Credentialing CCTC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2026mi00113
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell, Sr.
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Judge Craig Schwall, Paul Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Kirk Campbell
as 26-12464
Petitioner:
In re: KIRK CAMPBELL
Respondent:
J.M. CELESTE, A. SHICK, ENNIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
