Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Muhammad Bey v. Clarence Ayers, et al
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD BEY
Defendant:
CLARENCE D. AYERS, KIMBERLY ABOGUNRIN, GERALD E. SMITH and others
Kevin Smith v. Officer Foster, et al
as 24-1391
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E. SMITH
Defendant:
OFFICER FOSTER, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER BENNETT and others
Smith v. Carrillo et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E Smith
Defendant:
Samantha Carrillo, Cheryl Ward, Christina Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin Smith v. Officer Foster, et al
as 23-3007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN E. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER FOSTER, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER BENNETT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Kevin E Smith and Kevin Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIDDLETON v. PYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv00729
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. MIDDLETON
Respondent:
PAULA K. PYATTE, REBECCA M. EIMERMAN, BRIAN H. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Symphony Care Networks et al
as 1:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Defendant:
Symphony Care Networks, Symphony of Morgan Park and Nicole Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
SMITH v. JDW INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Smith
Defendant:
JDW International, Inc. and Nancy Durette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Mickey Group Inc v. Great Lakes Forest Products Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Mickey Group Inc and Mickey Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Great Lakes Forest Products Inc, Great Lakes Lamination Inc, Mark E Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
