Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv03050
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP
Defendant:
0.24 Acres of Real Estate in Morgan County, Illinois, Unknown Owners, Joshua E Smith and others
Bensen v. International Entertainment Consultants, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01049
Defendant:
George E. Smith and International Entertainment Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Courtney Bensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Troupe v. Fenderson et al
as 2:2019cv01318
Defendant:
Emily S Mueller, Antoinette Rich, Alice Rudebusch and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Troupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00287
Plaintiff:
Walter E. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bensen v. International Entertainment Consultants, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00663
Plaintiff:
Courtney Benson and Courtney Bensen
Defendant:
International Entertainment Consultants, Inc., d/b/a PTs Centerville, George E. Smith and International Entertainment Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Smith v. Cook et al
as 2:2018cv01300
Plaintiff:
Mario E Smith
Defendant:
CO Fairchild and Officer Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
