Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Arriasa Carrera v. J&R Earth, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02665
Plaintiff:
Erwin Arriasa Carrera
Defendant:
J&R Earth, Inc. doing business as J&R Earthworks, JBD Contracting, Inc. doing business as J&R Earthworks, Jack DaSilva and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Arizona Mining Reform Coalition et al v. Guzman et al
as 2:2023cv02038
Plaintiff:
Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity, Earthworks and others
Defendant:
Martha Guzman, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Dobbs Earthworks, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dobbs Earthworks, LLC, Lakeside Estates, Inc., Allen Arp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-16167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATAGONIA AREA RESOURCE ALLIANCE, ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and KERWIN S. DEWBERRY, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA STANDARD LLC and SOUTH32 HERMOSA, INC., AKA Arizona Minerals, Inc.
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 4:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Kerwin S Dewberry
Intervenor Defendant:
South32 Hermosa Incorporated, Arizona Standard LLC and Arizona Minerals Incorporated
Amicus Curiae:
Town of Patagonia
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
J.E. McAmis Inc. v. Scott's Earthworks Co.
as 6:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
J.E. McAmis Inc.
Defendant:
Scott's Earthworks Co. an Oregon corporation doing business as Rock 2 River Resources
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund et al v. Superior Earthworks LLC
as 2:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund, Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Fund and Western Washington Operating Engineers-Employers Training Trust Fund
Defendant:
Superior Earthworks LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
Paula Hill v. US
as 22-2076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAULA HILL, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Frank Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOHN ROE, JOHN JOE and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
THE LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, d/b/a Rea Contracting
Board of Trustees of the Locals 302 and 612 of the Intermational Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund et al v. Fenix Earthworks LLC
as 2:2022cv00799
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Locals 302 and 612 of the Intermational Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund, Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Fund, Western Washington Operating Engineers- Employers Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Fenix Earthworks LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SAN ANTONIO BAY ESTUARINE WATERKEEPER et al v. CONNOR et al
as 1:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
SAN ANTONIO BAY ESTUARINE WATERKEEPER, TEXAS CAMPAIGN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL L CONNOR, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL L. CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
