Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Hugler v. Davis-Paige Management Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Davis-Paige Management Systems, LLC, Michael E. Davis and Davis-Paige Management Systems 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hugler v. Absolute Quality Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Absolute Quality Landscaping, Inc. and Joseph Bell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hugler v. Austal USA, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Austal USA, LLC and HKA Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hugler v. Dura-Fibre LLC
as 1:2017cv00589
Defendant:
Dura-Fibre LLC
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hugler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Hugler v. Jack Frost Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00729
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hugler
Defendant:
Jack Frost Construction, Inc. and Billy J Sallurday
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hugler v. Riviera Stoneworks, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Riviera Stoneworks, Inc., Hood's Discount Home Center of Foley, Inc. and Michael J. Hood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michael Opela v. R. Alexander Acosta, et al
as 17-1788
Petitioner:
MICHAEL OPELA
Respondent:
EDWARD C. HUGLER, APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC., TUBELITE, INC. and others
Hugler v. Tire Warehouse of Troy, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Tire Warehouse of Troy, Inc., Tire Warehouse of Clifton Park, Inc., Tire Warehouse of North Country, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
R. Alexander Acosta v. Ashley Furniture Industries
as 17-1765
Petitioner:
EDWARD C. HUGLER, Acting Secretary of Labor and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Respondent:
ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02054
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
