Cases 41 - 50 of 81
CARTER v. REILLY et al
as 1:2008cv01998
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD CARTER
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02866
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRUESDALE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al
as 1:2008cv01862
Plaintiff:
ALVIN B. TRUESDALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DUNN v. REILLY et al
as 1:2008cv01432
Plaintiff:
KEITH L. DUNN
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Heatley v. Driver et al
as 5:2008cv00125
Petitioner:
Andre L. Heatley
Respondent:
Joe Driver and Edward F. Reilly, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv01419
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Byrd
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AUSTIN v. REILLY
as 1:2008cv00553
Plaintiff:
ROMES AUSTIN
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gerald Rogers v. Mary Schapiro
as 08-5069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gerald L. Rogers
Defendant - Appellee:
Harvey L. Pitt, Securities and Exchange Commission, Christopher Cox, Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary L. Schapiro, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00337
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cordero v. Martinez et al
as 4:2008cv00390
Petitioner:
Luis Cordero
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Michael J. Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
