Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Richard Donastorg v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2018cv00992
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Brennan Falconieri, William Mlodzinski and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Donastorg
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Arthur K Cunningham and Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
David Chacon v. Ontario Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
David Chacon
Defendant:
Brennan Falconieri, Edward Flores, Ontario Police Department and others
Chacon v. Ontario Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00992
Plaintiff:
David Chacon
Defendant:
Ontario Police Department, Matthew E. Zick, Edward Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Ortega v. Mark Ritchie, et al
as 17-15497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS ARMANDO ORTEGA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK RITCHIE, M.D., AMARJIT GREWAL, M.D., BEVERLY PURDY, Santa Clara County Jail Physician and others
Carlos Edward Flores v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2016cv01020
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Carlos Edward Flores
Flores v. Exclusa et al
as 1:2016cv04264
Plaintiff:
Edward Flores
Defendant:
S. Exclusa, K. Pfeifer, B. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Edward F Alvarez v. Carlock et al
as 5:2014cv01373
Plaintiff:
Edward Flores Alvarez
Defendant:
Carlock, Carlock, Cynthia Y Tampkins and others
United States of America v. Rivera
as 12-4005
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roni Amrussi, Brian Greenwald, Roman Zadiriyev and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Hector Rivera
Edward Flores v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2012cv01927
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Edward Flores
Manse Sullivan v. T. Ryan, et al
as 11-17506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANSE SULLIVAN
Defendant:
T. P. RYAN, JIM BOBCOCK and R. BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD FLORES, Chief, PAUL JONES, Sergeant, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
