Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas v. Harry et al
as 1:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thomas
Defendant:
Laurel Harry , Kenneth D. Kyler , Gerald Rozum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. OPPMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER OPPMAN, GILMORE, C. J. MCKEOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
RONALD BANKS
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL J. GEHLMANN, BARRY GRUBB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. LANE
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
ANDY MOORE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM, DEPUTY GELHMANN, DEPUTY ALLEN JOSPHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MULLIGAN et al
as 3:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
ANDY MOORE
Defendant:
EDWARD MULLIGAN, SUE DARR, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MULLIGAN et al
as 3:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
ANDY MOORE
Defendant:
EDWARD MULLIGAN, SUE DARR, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTON v. SUPERINTENDENT GERALD L. ROZUM et al
as 3:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
DANTE BURTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GERALD L. ROZUM, MAJOR DANIEL J. GEHLMANN, UNIT MANAGER EDWARD MULLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
SHAUN WRIGHT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONNA VARNER, TRACY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAWLS v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008mc00061
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RICK ZERAMBO, KARREN GLADDNEY and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
