Cases 1 - 10 of 71
TAYLOR v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
KEVIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., BRUCE LEMMON, EDWIN BUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COOK
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., BRUCE LEMMON, EDWIN BUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
H. CHRISTIAN DEBUYN, DAVID DONAHUE, J. WYNN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. COLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIZANO v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2012cv01393
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, COUNTY OF LAKE, MITCH DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
ALVINO PIZANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanham v. Wilson et al
as 3:2012cv00484
Plaintiff:
Tony Arias Lanham
Defendant:
Keith Wilson and Edwin Buss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Darius K Dodson
Defendant:
Mark Levenhagen, George Payne, Corey McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv00155
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER, EDWIN BUSS, DIANA DAUGHERTY and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. TILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALKHALIDI et al v. BUSS et al
as 1:2011cv00609
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH ALKHALIDI, KHALFANI KHALDUN, CLARENCE MERRIETTE and others
Defendant:
JAMES BAESINGER, EDWIN BUSS, BEVERLY GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROWE v. FINNAN et al
as 1:2011cv00524
Defendant:
LISA ASH, DANIEL BODLOVICH, EDWIN BUSS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Haury v. Lemon et al
as 3:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter Haury
Defendant:
Bruce Lemon, Mark Sevier, Clair Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
