Cases 1 - 10 of 42
ACEVES et al v. Coinbase Global, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02663
Plaintiff:
GERARDO ACEVES, Thomas Fan, Edwin Martinez and others
Defendant:
Coinbase Global, Inc., Coinbase, Inc., COINBASE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud
USA v. Martinez-Brilia
as 24-20153
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edwin Martinez-Brilia
MARTINEZ-GUZMAN v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv02156
Petitioner:
EDWIN MARTINEZ-GUZMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez-Brilia v. The United States of America
as 4:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
Edwin Martinez-Brilia
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez v. Guerra et al
as 7:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Pete Edwin Martinez
Defendant:
Eddie Guerra, Corporal Mora, Adan Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06519
Plaintiff:
Edwin Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martinez-Guzman v. FCI Schuylkill, Warden
as 1:2022fp00520
Petitioner:
Edwin Martinez-Guzman
Respondent:
FCI Schuylkill, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez-Guzman v. Sage
as 3:2022cv01333
Petitioner:
Edwin Martinez-Guzman
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10088
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
