Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rodriguez v. Landy et al
as 9:2020cv00556
Defendant:
C.O. White, Venettozzi, MA Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Lane et al
as 3:2019cv01134
Defendant:
Micki Powanda, Elizabeth Stahl and Warden Kathy P. Lane
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03333
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Cooley et al v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv03117
Plaintiff:
Brian Cooley, Robert Loveland and Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Jeff Korte, Wexford Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley et al v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01834
Plaintiff:
Brian Cooley, Herman L Nitz, Jr, Robert Loveland and others
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Jeff Korte, Wexford Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03105
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
EDWIN RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Department of Corrections of N.Y.S. et al
as 9:2015cv01532
Petitioner:
Edwin Rodriguez
Respondent:
Department of Corrections of N.Y.S. and Great Meadow C.F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Spaulding
as 3:2014cv01307
Petitioner:
Edwin Rodriguez
Respondent:
Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SOMERSET et al
as 3:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
EDWIN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SOMERSET, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT HEREIN, NURSE KAREN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SOMERSET et al
as 2:2014cv02322
Plaintiff:
EDWIN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SOMERSET and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT HEREIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
