Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jennings v. EEOC et al
as 5:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jennings
Defendant:
EEOC, Fayetteville Police Department, Springdale Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Agakpe v. Sims et al
as 4:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Prosper Atsu Agakpe
Defendant:
Edmond Sims and EEOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak, et al
as 23-2136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Defendant:
Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Verteran Affairs and A.G. Merrick B. Garland
Defendant / Appellee:
Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC and Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs
Giles v. EEOC of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2022cv01483
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. Giles
Defendant:
EEOC of Minneapolis, Karen Seymour, Ms. Lauren Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Barbara Nesbit v. NE Health and Human Services, et al
as 19-2700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Barbara Ann Nesbit
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Wilson, EEOC and Nebraska Health and Human Services
Wendy Yohn v. EEOC, et al
as 19-2597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wendy D. Yohn
Defendant / Appellee:
EEOC, St. Louis Office, Department of Health and Human Services and Judge Kendra R. Howard
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
