Cases 1 - 10 of 14,441
El Karmassi v. LOT Corporation
as 1:2025cv01007
Plaintiff:
Mohammed El Karmassi
Defendant:
LOT Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
El v. Stewart et al
as 5:2025cv00581
Plaintiff:
Randy Brackins El
Defendant:
Wendell Scott Stewart, Dwight Lewis Mosby and Sherry Denise Heddleston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Arce et al v. Murray et al
as 3:2025cv00129
Plaintiff:
Damian Arce and Tyisha Mullen
Defendant:
Darnell Murray, Jr., Branden Duchene and City Of El Paso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SETON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. KENNEDY
as 1:2025cv01185
Plaintiff:
SETON MEDICAL CENTER, MONTEREY PARK HOSPITAL, GARFIELD MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EL HALABY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv02772
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN G EL HALABY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Hale-El v. Brandt, et al
as 25-1145
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant:
CAPTAIN BRANDT, SGT. TAYLOR, SGT. VALLRE and others
Brauer v. El Progreso Hispano, Corp.
as 3:2025cv00260
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Brauer
Defendant:
El Progreso Hispano, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
EL-BARDICY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2025cv01923
Plaintiff:
MAHA EL-BARDICY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. United States President Donald Trump et al
as 4:2025cv01738
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ann Garcia
Defendant:
United States President Donald Trump, Governor Greg Abbott, Senator Ted Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
