Cases 51 - 60 of 175
ALSTON v. ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
as 3:2013cv05157
Plaintiff:
SHAWNE ALSTON
Defendant:
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gametek, LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc.
as 3:2013cv03472
Plaintiff:
Gametek LLC
Defendant:
Electronic Arts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bassett v. Electronic Arts Inc.
as 1:2013cv04208
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Bassett
Defendant:
Electronic Arts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Myhrvold v. Lodsys Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01173
Plaintiff:
Nathan Myhrvold
Defendant:
Lodsys Inc , Electronic Arts Inc and Rovio Entertainment LTD
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Geoffrey Pecover, et al v. Aaron Mlller
as 13-16336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEOFFREY PECOVER, ANDREW OWENS, SAMUEL MICHAEL KELLER and others
Objector - Appellant:
AARON MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
Myhrvold v. Lodsys Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00088
Plaintiff:
Nathan Myhrvold
Defendant:
Lodsys Inc , Electronic Arts Inc and Rovio Entertainment LTD
Trena Steward et al v. Kanye West et al
as 2:2013cv02449
Plaintiff:
Trena Steward, Lorenzo Pryor and Karla Ray
Defendant:
Kanye West, UMG Recordings Inc, Roc-A-Fella Records LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
Defendant:
Electronic Arts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc.
as 1:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Defendant:
Electronic Arts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Marc Opperman , Judy Long , Claire Moses and others
Defendant:
Path, Inc. , Twitter, Inc. , Apple Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
