Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Capital Records, Inc., et al v. Tenenbaum
as 09-1091
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., a Delaware corporation, VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARISTA RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, SONY MUSIC ENTERTAIN SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT INC., a Delaware corporation, UMG RECORDINGS INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Defendant:
JUDITH SABATINO, MARYANN BRAYDEN, RHONDA CAMERON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL TENENBAUM
Third Party Defendant:
INTERSCOPE RECORDS and PRIORITY RECORDS LLC
:
, , and others
IN RE: Sony BMG Music Entertai
as 09-1090
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., a Delaware corporation, VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation and others
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ARISTA RECORDS, LLC, a Delaware corporation, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, BMG MUSIC, a New York general partnership and others
Defendant:
JUDITH SABATINO, MARYANN BRAYDEN, RHONDA CAMERON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE SIMMONS, WALID SMAYHA, REGINA POSHKUS and others
Defendant - Movant:
ENZA VIOLA, RYAN HALLAHAN and SHELAGH HAYES
Defendant - Respondent:
GURI JANE ANDERSSKOG, COLLEEN AZEVEDO, HENRY BISNAW and others
:
, , and others
Movant - Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION, ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, FREE PRESS and others
UMG RECORDINGS, INC. et al v. ROACH
as 1:2008cv00674
Plaintiff:
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, INTERSCOPE RECORDS, SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT and others
Defendant:
LINDSAY ROACH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, a Delaware general partnership; Lava Records LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., a Delaware corporation; UMG Recordings, Inc., a v. Cody
as 1:2008at00232
Plaintiff:
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, a Delaware general partnership; Lava Records LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., a Delaware corporation; UMG Recordings, Inc., a
Defendant:
Heinsohn Cody
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Elektra Entertainment Group, I, et al v. Carmen Conte
as 08-55465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, WARNER BROS RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CARMEN CONTE
Motown Record Company, L.P., a California limited partnership et al v. Does 1-15
as 3:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Motown Record Company, L.P., a California limited partnership, Motown Record Company, L.P., a California limited partnership, Motown Record Company, L.P., a California limited partnership and others
Defendant:
Does 1-15
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Atlantic Recording Corporation, A Delaware Corporation et al v. Drew Durr
as 5:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Recording Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Atlantic Recording Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and others
Defendant:
Drew Durr
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., a Delaware corporation, et al v. Chiappa
as 1:2007cv00322
Plaintiff:
Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., a Delaware corporation,, Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., a Delaware corporation,, Interscope Records and others
Defendant:
Laura Chiappa
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation et al v. Broyles
as 3:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Warner Bros. Records, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Defendant:
Melissa Broyles
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
