Cases 1 - 10 of 527
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
Ragsdale v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Duncan Ragsdale
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Mann v. USA
as 1:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Gabrielle Mann
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DODSON et al v. WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
JOHN DODSON, SCOTT TURNER, JOSEPH GALLAGHER and others
Defendant:
WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. and JONATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TEASLEY v. O'BRIEN
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
The State of New Jersey, Union County Prosecutor's Office, Elizabeth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Wilder et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024ct03038
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Estate of Carolyn Bryant and Federal Judge Elizabeth Mulligan
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Federal Judge Richard E. Myers, II, New Hanover County NC Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dixon
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
