Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47855
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ELTON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01526
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ELTON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. NIGRO et al
as 1:2016cv00145
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
AUGUSTINE NIGRO, RONALD C MCARTHUR, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
In re: Deepwater Horizon
as 14-30269
Plaintiff:
ROBERT YOUNG
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
ELTON JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INCORPORATED, BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED and BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Johnson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01789
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 3 and Police Officer Michael Shreve
Plaintiff:
Elton Johnson and Natalie Van Cooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Young v. BP Exploration & Production, et al
as 12-20512
Defendant - Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC., BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC and BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELTON JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
