Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Finnegan v. Head et al
as 3:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Defendant:
Randall C Head, Kelly M Gaumer, Michael Morphet and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ENNIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00939
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
STEVE ENNIS and LINDA L. ENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dodson v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
Lane Grant Dodson
Defendant:
Douglas Carter , David Bacon , Matthew Emenhiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ennis v. USA
as 1:2016cv00240
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Brenton Ennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ennis v. Superintendent
as 3:2014cv02102
Petitioner:
Brandon M Ennis
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PHILLIPS et al v. BANK OF INDIANA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2013cv00412
Defendant:
BANK OF INDIANA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, RICHARD BUSH, DALE CONRAD and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K PHILLIPS, JESSICA PHILLIPS, GEOFF SHUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
