Cases 1 - 10 of 13
USA v. Eugene Smith, III
as 22-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EUGENE SMITH, III
Smith v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc., John Doe and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
USA v. Eugene Smith, III
as 19-1530
Defendant / Appellant:
EUGENE SMITH, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. USA
as 1:2018cv12227
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eugene Smith, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01596
Plaintiff:
Vernon Eugene Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. USA
as 1:2014cv00307
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eugene Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. E I DuPont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Smith
Defendant:
E I DuPont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Crawford et al
as 3:2012cv00892
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eugene Smith and Keith Allen Powell
Defendant:
Tony Crawford, Janie Russell and Ross Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Cwik v. Cynthia Dillon, et al
as 11-3247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW S. CWIK
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA L. DILLON, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as general counsel of Cincinnati Public Schools, EUGENE SMITH, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as principal of Riverview East Academy, SHERRY JOHNSON, in his individual capacity and in her capacity as vice principal of Riverview East Academy and others
Preston Buschard v. State of Ohio, et al
as 09-4159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON BUSCHARD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY, PAUL GEORGE EL, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
