Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ubilluz et al v. PG Environmental Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01867
Defendant:
PG Environmental Services, Inc., Green Earth Solutions, Inc., Michael Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Munoz and Gilberto Ubilluz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CUENCA CORONEL TRANSPORTATION INC v. GREEN EARTH SOLUTIONS, INC et al
as 2:2020cv02568
Defendant:
GREEN EARTH SOLUTIONS, INC, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and MICHELS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CUENCA CORONEL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Submar, Inc. v. Edwards, et al
as 2:2018cv02429
Plaintiff:
Submar, Inc.
Defendant:
Mojave Earth Solutions, Inc. and Robert Winfield Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Gesualdi et al v. Global Environmental Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06743
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Corbett, Louis Bisignano, Frank H. Finkel and others
Defendant:
Green Earth Solutions, Inc. and Global Environmental Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Leonard v. Earth Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00699
Plaintiff:
Richard Leonard
Defendant:
Earth Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Clean Earth Solutions, Inc. v. Vegte et al
as 3:2011cv02397
Plaintiff:
Clean Earth Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Steve Vande Vegte and Brian Huster
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stress Less, Inc. v. Earth Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00302
Plaintiff:
Stress Less, Inc. and Stress Less, Inc.
Defendant:
Earth Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SRS Energy, Inc. et al v. Clean Earth Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00285
Defendant:
Bio-Products International, Inc., Clean Earth Solutions, Inc., Michael H. Eley and others
Plaintiff:
SRS Energy, Inc. and Cleantech Biofuels, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
