Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Easley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Joseph F Easley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wright v. Falcon School District 49 et al
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Michaela Wright
Defendant:
Falcon School District 49, Franklin (I) Hinson, Franklin Hinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Illinois National Insurance Company v. Easley et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Illinois National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Daniel Easley, Donovan Gonnie, Francisco Sarmiento Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pierce v. Kobach, et al
as 23-3155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOREHEI PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
KRIS KOBACH, TIM EASLEY and JEFF ZMUDA
Taylor (ID 40516) v. Easley
as 5:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
Ernest L. Taylor
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Tim Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pierce v. Kobach et al
as 5:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Morehei Pierce and Christopher Pierce
Defendant:
Kris Kobach, Tim Easley and Jeff Zmuda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Easley
as 5:2023cv03023
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Tim Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes (ID 105577) v. Easley et al
as 5:2022cv03315
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Hughes and Dashawn Hughes
Defendant:
Tim Easley, Paul Cory, Joel East and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Easley
as 5:2022cv03307
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Tim Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Easley
as 5:2022cv03171
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Tim Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
