Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Easley v. CDC - California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00668
Plaintiff:
Steven Easley
Defendant:
CDC - California Department of Corrections, Sacramento Sheriff's Department and Neighborhood Crime Watch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Easley
as 5:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Defendant:
Catherine Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PNC Bank, National Association v. Haney Truck Line, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00827
Defendant:
Easley Hauling Service, Inc., Great American Transport, LLC, Haney Logistics, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Receiver:
David P Stapleton
Ocean Development, Inc. v. Archie McNeal et al
as 2:2017cv08144
Defendant:
Does, La Gina Easley, Archie McNeal and others
Plaintiff:
Ocean Development, Inc.
Easley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017at00241
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Easley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Easley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00475
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Easley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Easley v. City of Morgan Hill et al
as 5:2017cv00771
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Defendant:
City of Morgan Hill, Morgan Hill Police Department and Valley Medical Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Easley v. Roseville Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv01793
Plaintiff:
Gary Easley
Defendant:
Roseville Police Department, Vivian Sa, Anytime Fitness, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2016cv03064
Plaintiff:
Mark Easley , Ruth Easley , Kris Mize and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Easley v. Drobcky et al
as 3:2016cv02778
Plaintiff:
Myra L. Easley
Defendant:
Nicholas Drobcky and Woodminster Real Estate Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
