Cases 1 - 10 of 19
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC) Easley v. Strain/Hall et al
as 2:2020cv00103
Plaintiff:
Steven Jerome Easley
Defendant:
Thomas Vincent, Terri Hall, Ashley Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Taylor v. Alardo et al
as 2:2019cv02241
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor and Brandon La'Shaun Taylor
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, D. Easley, J. Alardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. CDC - California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00668
Plaintiff:
Steven Easley
Defendant:
CDC - California Department of Corrections, Sacramento Sheriff's Department and Neighborhood Crime Watch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017at00241
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Easley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Easley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00475
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Easley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Easley v. Roseville Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv01793
Plaintiff:
Gary Easley
Defendant:
Roseville Police Department, Vivian Sa, Anytime Fitness, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Harris, et al.
as 2:2015cv02146
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thompson
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Gabriel Ullrich and Liz Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Smith
as 2:2015cv01429
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Easley
Defendant:
P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. State Attorney General
as 2:2013cv01106
Petitioner:
Gary D. Easley
Respondent:
State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
