Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Webb v. Easley et al
as 5:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lee Webb
Defendant:
Mike Easley, Roy Cooper, Kevin Goff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barnette v. Wilson et al
as 5:2008ct03065
Plaintiff:
Donterrius Barnette
Defendant:
Brown, Easley, Nurse Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sumner v. Easley et al
as 5:2008hc02063
Petitioner:
David Nelson Sumner
Respondent:
Mike Easley and Theodis Beck
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2008ct03046
Plaintiff:
James Christopher Anderson
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Michael F. Easley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STEWART-EL BEY v. EASLEY et al
as 1:2008cv00218
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. STEWART
Defendant:
MIKE EASLEY, ROY COOPER, THEODIS BECK and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ANDERSON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and MICHAEL F. EASLEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pearson v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2008ct03022
Plaintiff:
Omar Demetrious Pearson
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Michael F. Easley, N.C. Innocence Inquiry Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARSON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2008cv00013
Plaintiff:
OMAR DEMITRIOUS PEARSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and MICHAEL F. EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Usategui v Michael Easley Governor Of North Carolina,et al
as 7:2007cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jay P. Usategui
Defendant:
Michael F Easley, Roy Cooper, III, Theodis Beck and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
HAIRSTON et al v. EASLEY et al
as 1:2007cv00704
Plaintiff:
IRENE F. HAIRSTON and PEGGY M. H. ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL EASLEY, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BRYANT THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
