Cases 41 - 50 of 306
EASTERLING v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07526
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO B. EASTERLING
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTERLING v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07247
Plaintiff:
LONNIE EASTERLING
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTERLING v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06972
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JERMAINE EASTERLING
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Octavius T. McDonald
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Ms. McClure, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTERLING v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv04463
Plaintiff:
DONALD EASTERLING
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, THE NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prude v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Franklin Prude
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Walter Myers, Sgt. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTERLING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02027
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN EASTERLING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Terry v. Richie et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Draper Scott Terry
Defendant:
Warden Richie, Captain Lawson, Mr. Anglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparkman v. Easterling
as 1:2016cv00012
Petitioner:
Hudell Sparkman
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rickey Crittendon v. Easterling CF Warden, et al
as 16-10740
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKEY CRITTENDON
Respondent - Appellee:
EASTERLING CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
