Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Hottenrott et al v. Iron, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff: Tammy Moyer, Karen Hottenrott, Tammy Cairns and others
Defendant: Iron, County of, Melanie Camps, Menominee, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kevin Cassaday v. Kelli Brozanski, et al
as 23-1571
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Defendant / Appellee: KELLI A. BROZANSKI, ATTORNEY KROLL, for defendant, EATON COUNTY, MI, Judicial and others
Cassaday v. Brozanski et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00550
Plaintiff: RESTRICTED FILER Kevin William Cassaday
Defendant: Kelli A. Brozanski, Unknown Kroll, Eaton, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant: VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor: TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner: In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Fingal et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff: Daniel Fingal, Keith Kantor, Johanna McGee and others
Defendant: Ontonagon County, Michele Smith, Alger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Frederick Grainger, Jr. v. Ottawa County, MI, et al
as 23-1230
Plaintiff: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR.
Intervenor: BRIAN BEHOVITZ
Defendant / Appellee: OTTAWA COUNTY, MI, by its Board of Commissioners, AMANDA PRICE, in her individual and official capacity, BRADLEY SLAGH, in his individual capacity and others
Sanderson v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff: Nicholas Sanderson and Nicholas Sanderson doing business as SCS Management
Defendant: Eaton County, Christopher Garrison, Chris Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Joseph Davis v. Zachary Chorak, et al
as 22-1839
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH EDWARD DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUTY A. TOOKER, DEPUTY J. C. SCAVARDA and EATON COUNTY, MI, a municipal corporation organzied under the laws of the State of Michigan
Defendant: ZACHARY DAVID CHORAK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?