Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Green v. Kinkeade
as 3:2024cv02864
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tepe v. IRS
as 24-10742
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Ed Kinkeade, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC and others
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
In re: Mawule Tepe
as 24-10722
Respondent:
Rebecca Rutherford, Internal Revenue Service, Whirlpool Corporation and others
Petitioner:
In re: Mawule Tepe
Tepe v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation, United States, Ed Kinkeade and others
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meeks v. DeBouse
as 23-10574
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Arthur Meeks
Defendant / Appellee:
Alvin DeBouse, United States Probation Officer, Northern District of Texas, Arlington Division, FNU LNU, Chief Probation Officer/Supervisor United States Probation-Northern District of Texas, Ed Kinkeade's Courtroom-Arlington Division, FNU LNU, Supervisor, John Doe Task Force and others
Drake et al v. John Doe Trucking Company et al
as 3:2020cv03189
Plaintiff:
EV Drake, Eric Drake, E V Drake and others
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Sidney Fitzwater, Charles Noteboom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West v. Kinkeade
as 3:2020cv02952
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade
Plaintiff:
David James West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drake et al v. John Doe Trucking Company et al
as 1:2020cv00353
Plaintiff:
E.V. Drake and Eric Drake
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Sidney Fitzwater, Charles Noteboom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Purimetla et al
as 3:2020cv01740
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Jos A Bank, Kranthi Purimetla and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Fish et al
as 3:2020cv01633
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Rebecca Rutherford, Sidney A Fitzwater and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
