Cases 31 - 40 of 181
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03087
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. County of Contra Costa
as 5:2020cv06848
Plaintiff:
Gale Joseph Young, Gabriel Young and Eddie Williams
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Superintendent of SCI-Greene et al
as 1:2020cv00908
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Superintendent of SCI-Greene and District Attorney of Lebanon County
Petitioner:
Eddie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv55246
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Lockwood v. Eddie Williams, et al
as 20-10337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT D. LOCKWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE L. ARMSTRONG, Assistant Warden, GLEN WHITFIELD, EDDIE WILLIAMS, Senior Warden and others
PEELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28391
Plaintiff:
PEELS and EDDIE WILLIAM PEELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02962
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eddie Williams
Karl Harris, et al v. YRC Worldwide Inc.
as 19-3255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS JACKSON, EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR., DERRICK RIAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
YRC WORLDWIDE INC., also known as YRC, Inc.
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv01892
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karl Harris, et al v. YRC Worldwide Inc.
as 19-1721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS JACKSON, EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR., DERRICK RIAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
YRC WORLDWIDE INC., also known as YRC, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
