Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Matheson v. Farris et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert Chase Matheson
Defendant:
Eddie Farris and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Sanders v. Nash et al
as 2:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Jody Moses, Tim Nash and Eddie Farris
Plaintiff:
James David Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Farris et al
as 2:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bernard Woodard
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Brandon, Eddie Farris, Phil Arms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdwell v. Putnam County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv00095
Defendant:
Lt. Zack Maxwell, Brandon Dillon, Sam Limauro and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Birdwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Wiggins et al
as 2:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Sheriff Eddie Farris, Steven Hiott, Bill Randolph and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ray Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray et al v. Phillips et al
as 2:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Sheriff Eddie Farris, Steven Hiott, Bill Randolph and others
Plaintiff:
Janice Murray, Kathryn M. and Stephen R. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows et al v. Putnam County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mack Meadows and Rhonda Meadows
Defendant:
Eddie Farris, Putnam County, Tennessee, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Putnam County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv00066
Defendant:
Putnam County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department, Putnam County, Tennessee and Eddie Farris
Plaintiff:
Chadrick Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strode v. Farris
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Weylin Trent Strode
Defendant:
Eddie Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
