Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Linda Wright v. USA, et al
as 22-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Defendant:
ARBORS REHABILITATION, -TEXAS, DEXTER GOEI, LONE TREE CONVALESCENT and others
Brown v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00004
Petitioner:
Edmund Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kancilla, D.C. v. Brown, Jr. et al
as 3:2013cv02737
Plaintiff:
Dirk Kancilia, D.C.
Defendant:
Edmund Brown, Jr., Kamala D. Harris , Christine Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Revoal v. Brown
as 2:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
William R. Revoal, II
Defendant:
Edmund Brown, Jr. and Community Service Partnership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staich v. Brown
as 2:2013cv00107
Petitioner:
Ivan Von Staich
Respondent:
Edmund Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert L Darnall Sr v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv10412
Plaintiff:
Robert L Darnall, Sr
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, Edmund Brown, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Think Computer Corp v. Venchiarutti et al
as 5:2011cv05496
Defendant:
Robert Venchiarutti, William Haraf, Traci Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Think Computer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv05176
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Turner
Defendant:
Melody Smith, Gregory Sims, John Bent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv04948
Petitioner:
Stephen B. Turner
Respondent:
Matthew Cate, Robert Ambroselli, Edmund Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Yates et al
as 3:2010cv02006
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Anderson
Respondent:
James A Yates and Edmund Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
