Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Joaquin Carmona-Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3317
Petitioner:
JOAQUIN EDUARDO CARMONA-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Amaya et al v. Ed's Landscapes & Services, Corp. et al
as 2:2018cv02473
Defendant:
Ed's Landscapes & Services, Corp. and Eduardo Carmona
Plaintiff:
Cesar Fuentes and Francisco Amaya
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLC v. Mayra Salcedo et al
as 5:2017cv01947
Plaintiff:
Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLC
Defendant:
Eduardo Carmona, Does, Hernaldo Hernandez and others
Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLC v. Mayra Salcedo et al
as 5:2017cv01749
Plaintiff:
Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLC
Defendant:
Eduardo Carmona, Does, Fredy Hernaldo Hernandez and others
Doe v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2014cv00840
Defendant:
Eduardo Carmona, Corrections Corporation of America and Officer John Roe
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Carmona
as 1:2011cv00522
Defendant:
Eduardo Carmona
Plaintiff:
Yaaziyah Yisrayl Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClintock v. Carmona et al
as 1:2009cv00936
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan McClintock
Defendant:
Eduardo Carmona, ., Karl Thomas, Petra Oropeza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Carmona et al
as 4:2008cv00031
Plaintiff:
Freddy Dominguez
Defendant:
Eduardo Carmona, Rodriguez, Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cantu v. Carmona, et al
as 07-50662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTHA CANTU
Defendant - Appellee:
EDUARDO CARMONA, FRANK RODRIGUEZ, Officer and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Baxter v. Carmona et al
as 4:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Baxter
Defendant:
Eduardo Carmona, Sheri Talley, Keneth Seidel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
