Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mendoza Delgado v. Garland
as 24-998
Petitioner:
ELMER MENDOZA DELGADO, JHENY CECILIA GUAMAN AGUAYZA, ABRAHAN EDUARDO MENDOZA GUAMAN and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chalifoux v. Mendoza et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Chalifoux
Defendant:
Carlos Eduardo Mendoza and Leslie Hoffman Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Howard v. City of Jennings et al
as 2:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Talj Howard
Defendant:
City of Jennings, Eduardo Mendoza, Christopher Bergeaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fearheily v. Semmes et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
Brent Joseph Fearheily
Defendant:
Eduardo Mendoza and Danny Semmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 5:2020cv00041
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Luis Eduardo Mendoza, Jr. and Cecilia Rosales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mata v. Mendoza et al
as 6:2019cv01670
Defendant:
Todd D'Albor, New Iberia Police Department, Corey Mendoza Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eduardo Mendoza v. Subaru of America, et al
as 2:2019cv09778
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 and Subaru of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Eduardo Mendoza, Jr.
as 18-35571
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO MENDOZA, Jr., AKA Ben Davis
McCurley et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
Suzanne McCurley , Charles McFadden , Bob McIntyre and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc , Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft , Arlington Dealership Acquisition, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
