Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Charles Allen v. J. Cardenas, et al
as 20-55788
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, J. CARDENAS, Correctional Officer, M. POLLARD, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Allen v. Cardenas et al
as 3:2020cv00788
Defendant:
M. Carrillo, Ralph M. Diaz, L. Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Allen v. Booth et al
as 3:2020cv00685
Defendant:
A. Booth, W.L. Montgomery and Ralph M. Diaz
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McElroy v. USA
as 3:2020cv00211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Edward Allen McElroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Allen #133930 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05780
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Allen
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Allen v. J. Cardenas, et al
as 19-56419
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, J. CARDENAS, Correctional Officer, M. POLLARD, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Allen v. USA
as 1:2019cv00118
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Harry Edward Allen, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Allen v. Cardenas et al
as 3:2019cv01610
Defendant:
M. Carrillo, Ralph M. Diaz, L. Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Landaker v. A.W. Chesterton Company, et al
as 2:2019at00433
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC and A.W. Chesterton Company
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen Landaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Landaker v. A.W. Chesterton Company, et al
as 2:2019cv00987
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, Owens-Illinois Inc, The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen Landaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
