Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dunn Jr. v. Lee
as 5:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Dunn Jr. v. Holden
as 5:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Betty Faye Brown Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dunn Jr. v. Holden
as 5:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baker v. Alpha Consolidated Holdings, Inc.
as 22-1062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM EDWARD BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ALPHA CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS, INC. and ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC., dba Gumout
USA v. Michael Baker
as 21-50164
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD BAKER, AKA B-Mike, AKA Mike Baker, AKA Mike E. Baker, AKA Mike Ed Baker, AKA Michael Bauer, AKA Michael Edward Bauer, AKA Mike Bauer, AKA Butter
Edward Baker, et al v. Livanova PLC, et al
as 17-8059
Plaintiff - Respondent:
EDWARD BAKER and JACK MILLER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
LIVANOVA PLC
Defendant - Petitioner:
SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH and SORIN GROUP USA INC
Baker et al v. Livanova PLC
as PAM/1:01-16-00260
Plaintiff:
Edward Baker and Jack Miller
Defendant:
Sorin Group Deutschland GMBH and Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv07001
Defendant:
Mars Petcare US, Inc, Mars Petcare US, Inc., Nestle Purina Petcare Company and others
Plaintiff:
Moore, Tamara Moore, Greta L. Ervin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. John Baker
as 14-10356
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD BAKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
