Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Carr v. Rockingham Regional Jail
as 7:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
VA Doc Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Washington County TN Jail
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Washington County TN Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. R.S.W. Jail
as 7:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
R.S.W. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Washington County TN Jail
as 7:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Washington County TN Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 7:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Edward Carr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Carr v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv20706
Plaintiff:
Edward Carr
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
