Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Joseph Davis v. Zachary Chorak, et al
as 22-1839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH EDWARD DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY A. TOOKER, DEPUTY J. C. SCAVARDA and EATON COUNTY, MI, a municipal corporation organzied under the laws of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
ZACHARY DAVID CHORAK
Davis v. Chorak et al
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Davis
Defendant:
Zachary David Chorak, Deputy A. Tooker, Deputy J. C. Scavarda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Commissioner for Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
Kieth Edward Davis and Keith Edward Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner for Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
United States of America v. Carter et al
as 1:2018cv00109
Defendant:
Carolyn Sue Douglas, Nancy Elaine Davis, Marla Lea Carter and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00333
Plaintiff:
James Edward Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02227
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Davis v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01472
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Charles Davis
as 16-5734
Movant:
In re: CHARLES EDWARD DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark Dragomier, et al v. Local 1112 UAW, et al
as 14-4194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK DRAGOMIER, BUFFY BELL, JOSEPH BOOTH and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY S. FOWLER, Estate of, Christi R. Turner, Administrator
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCAL 1112 UAW, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
