Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Norman Davis v. Myles Strid
as 23-1794
Petitioner / Appellant:
Norman Edward Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
Myles Strid, Warden
Davis v. Strid
as 4:2022cv00515
Petitioner:
Norman Edward Davis
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Davis v. United States
as 20-1640
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Edward Davis
Davis v. USA
as 8:2020cv00055
Petitioner:
Edward Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCarter v. Davis
as 4:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Katherine Jane McCarter
Defendant:
John Edward Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Badger Capital, LLC, et al v. Chambers Bank of North AR, et al
as 10-3067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Badger Capital, LLC, S. Bradley Daniels, GWE Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Garnett and Karen Garnett
Defendant - Appellee:
Chambers Bank of North Arkansas, Chamber Bancshares, Inc., John Russell Meeks, Individually and as agent for Chambers Bank or North Arkasas and as agent for Northark Holdings LLC and others
Davis v. Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of et al
as 6:2010cv06057
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davis
Defendant:
Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of and Edward Davis
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
United States v. Darell Davis-Bey
as 09-2851
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Darell Edward Davis-Bey
Badger Capital, LLC et al v. Chambers Bank of North Arkansas et al
as 5:2008cv05141
Plaintiff:
Badger Capital, LLC, Bradley Daniels, Jay Garnett and others
Defendant:
Chambers Bank of North Arkansas, Chambers Bancshares, Inc., John Russell Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Golden Harvest, Inc. et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2007cv04096
Plaintiff:
Golden Harvest, Inc. and Toshimi Hira
Defendant:
William Edward Davis and William and Roxann Davis Company, L.L.C., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
