Cases 1 - 10 of 19
(PC) Diaz, II v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Henry Edward Diaz, II
Defendant:
CDCR, Edward Burden, Anthony Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. CDCR et al
as 3:2023cv04747
Plaintiff:
Henry Edward Diaz, II
Defendant:
CDCR, Edward Burden, Anthony Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv02337
Plaintiff:
Edward Diaz
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Diaz et al v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv19919
Plaintiff:
Edward Diaz and Connie Diaz
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DIAZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04632
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DIAZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Diaz
as 21-1087
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Diaz
Appellee:
United States of America
Henry Edward Diaz, II v. Stu Sherman
as 2:2020cv10934
Petitioner:
Henry Edward Diaz, II
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIAZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35671
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. 34.015 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Thomas Edward Diaz, Antonio Manuel Diaz, Jr, The Estate of Maria Hilaria Cavazos Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
