Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Harold Edward Robertson, Robert Charles Robinson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Coleman v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dwight R. Coleman, Robert Earl Jackson Little, Jason Daniels and others
Defendant:
Larry Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hager v. Willis et al
as 1:2020cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kristy Hager
Defendant:
Jordan Zoellner, Denise Pramuk, Terri Stanford Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2019cv01001
Plaintiff:
James Edward Jones
Defendant:
State Of Alabama, Mark Tunstall, Judge Zoghby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. King et al(MAG2)
as 1:2016mc03766
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael W. King
Garnishee:
Edward Jones Investments
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Jones v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00829
Plaintiff:
Clarence Edward Jones
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00765
Plaintiff:
Clarence Edward Jones
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Corizon et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00786
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Jones
Defendant:
Corizon, Jean Darbouze, Ms. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
