Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McLean et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv03291
Plaintiff:
Sara M McLean and Edward McLean
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLean et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv00145
Plaintiff:
Sara M McLean and Edward McLean
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James McLean, Jr. v. Warden FCI Estill
as 17-7216
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD MCLEAN, JR., a/k/a James Edward McLean, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FCI ESTILL
Metaphyzic Supreme-El v. Robert Payne
as 17-7158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
METAPHYZIC EL-ECTROMAGNETI SUPREME-EL, f/k/a Antonio Edward McLean
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. PAYNE, United States District Judge
Mclean v. FCI - Estill Warden
as 9:2016cv02956
Petitioner:
James Edward Mclean, Jr
Respondent:
Warden FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Metaphyzic Supreme-El
as 16-1476
Petitioner:
In re: METAPHYZIC EL-ECTROMAGNETI SUPREME-EL, f/k/a Antonio Edward McLean, a/k/a Metaphyzic Electromagnetic Supreme
Metaphyzic Supreme-El v. Director, Department of Corr.
as 15-6781
Petitioner - Appellant:
METAPHYZIC EL-ECTROMAGNETI SUPREME-EL, f/k/a Antonio Edward McLean
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Metaphyzic Supreme-El v. Director, Dept of Correction
as 15-6746
Petitioner - Appellant:
METAPHYZIC EL-ECTROMAGNETI SUPREME-EL, f/k/a Antonio Edward McLean
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
James McLean, Jr. v. Warden
as 14-7479
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD MCLEAN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI Estill
Mark French v. Edward McLean, et al
as 14-35831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD MCLEAN, in his official capacity as Chair of Montana's Judicial Standards Commission, BLAIR JONES, in his official capacity as Chair of Montana's Judicial Standards Commission, VICTOR VALGENTI, in his official capacity as Chair of Montana's Judicial Standards Commission and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
