Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Moss v. Salmon
as 7:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Moss
Respondent:
Joshua Salmon and Major Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moss v. BP3 Global, Incorporated
as 1:2021cv00734
Plaintiff:
Edward Moss
Defendant:
BP3 Global, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Moss v. Philbin et al
as 1:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edward Moss
Defendant:
Edward Philbin, Ms. FNU Daniel, Ms. FNU Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Salmon et al
as 7:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Sgt. Draper, Officer Sparrow, Nurse Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Zuidema et al
as 7:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Officer C.N. Harris, Officer Rippy, The City of Lynchburg and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smeaton v. Nelson
as 21-30140
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, H. S. Ott, Warden Federal Detention Center Oakdale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Smeaton
Keith Smeaton v. Alan Nelson, et al
as 20-30560
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, H. S. Ott, Warden Federal Detention Center Oakdale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Smeaton
Keith Smeaton v. Alan Nelson, et al
as 20-30559
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, H. S. Ott, Warden Federal Detention Center Oakdale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Smeaton
Keith Smeaton v. Alan Nelson, et al
as 20-30387
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, H. S. OTT, WARDEN FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER OAKDALE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH SMEATON
MOSS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2020cv00180
Defendant:
FOOD SERVICE CONTRACTOR, MEDICAL CONTRACTOR and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY EDWARD MOSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
