Cases 1 - 10 of 23
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06898
Plaintiff:
EDWARD RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Hugo Edward Ramirez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15399
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN EDWARD RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(SS) Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00985
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
In the Matter of Edward Robert Ramirez - #73655
as 3:2019mc80312
Respondent:
Edward Ramirez and Edward Robert Ramirez
United States of America v. Mcintosh
as 17-2623
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Ramirez, AKA Taz, Terrence Duhaney, AKA Bounty Killer, Turhan Jessamy, AKA Vay and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Louis McIntosh, AKA Lou D, AKA Lou Diamond, AKA G
Arthur Edward Ramirez v. Scott Frauenheim
as 2:2017cv03828
Respondent:
Scott Frauenheim
Petitioner:
Arthur Edward Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WAYNOR v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 2:2015cv06277
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. WAYNOR
Defendant:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE, DANIELLE FITZHENRY, MEGAN KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Ramirez v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 14-4063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Sai-E Johari v. The Volunteers of America et al
as 2:2014cv06365
Defendant:
Security Guard Aundray, Sheriff Leroy Baca, Candace Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Sai-E Johari
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
