Cases 1 - 10 of 24
SAMUELS v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2022cv04938
Plaintiff:
MR. JAMES EDWARD SAMUELS, III and JAMES MCBRIDE, JARREH GRAHAM, BRANDON GRAHAM
Defendant:
PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pileckas et al v. DE Homes Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01212
Plaintiff:
James Pileckas and Edward Samuel
Defendant:
DE Homes Inc. and Matt Funston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MATAYKA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14739
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SAMUEL MATAYKA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel, Edwards v. Aptim Evironmental and DSW HOMES, LLC , etal
as 1:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
Edward Samuel
Defendant:
Aptim Environmental, DSW HOMES, LLC, Infrastructure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODWIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95012
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SAMUEL GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOTELO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58629
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SAMUEL SOTELO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33803
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SAMUEL STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fuller v. Nguyen et al
as 2:2017cv00600
Plaintiff:
Edward Samuel Fuller
Defendant:
Eugene Nguyen, O.J. Abu, R. Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Bernat v. Superintendent Laurel Highland, et al
as 16-4211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD SAMUEL BERNAT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
