Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Santiago v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03249
Plaintiff:
Edwin Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santiago v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv16142
Plaintiff:
Edwin Santiago, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
Edwin Santiago
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23862
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santiago v. Davidson County Sheriff's et al
as 3:2023cv00400
Petitioner:
Edwin Santiago, Jr.
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's and DDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Avilez v. Santiago
as 20-4014
Defendant:
CNM Edwin Santiago, Melissa Avilez, Urban Health Plan Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jimmy Viera, as Executor of the Estate of Melissa Avilez
Santiago Aponte v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv01771
Plaintiff:
Edwin Santiago Aponte
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SANTIAGO et al v. WALMART, INC.
as 5:2020cv04721
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SANTIAGO and JACQUELINE SANTIAGO
Defendant:
WALMART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82524
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SANTIAGO
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75997
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SANTIAGO
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
