Cases 1 - 10 of 222
GUTKO v. BEDFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
MAKSIM GUTKO
Defendant:
BEDFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DR. MCLAUGHLIN and WARDEN EICHENLAUB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITHSON v. C.O. HOWELL et al
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA GARRETT SMITHSON
Defendant:
C.O. HOWELL, WARDEN EICHENLAUB, LT. IMLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Laybourn et al
as 5:2021ct03295
Plaintiff:
Trevor Eugene Reed
Defendant:
Dr. Katherine Laybourn, Dr. Mark Dicocco, Ms. Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EICHENLAUB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19800
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EICHENLAUB
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poindexter v. Luther et al
as 3:2020cv01921
Defendant:
Superintendent J. Luther, Eichenlaub and Unit Manager Goss
Plaintiff:
Dewell Poindexter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Jones v. US
as 19-7580
Defendant / Appellee:
C. LAFLUER, Assistant Hospital Administator, J. F. CARAWAY, Regional Director, JAMIE HAMILTON, Hospital Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY JONES
Burk v. Runk et al
as 1:2019cv01358
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Ail Burk, Sr.
Defendant:
Green, Bill Drubelbis, LT. Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Heyer v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
as 19-7027
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SARA M. REVELL, THOMAS R. KANE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, IKE EICHENLAUB, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons Mid-Atlantic Region and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PAUL BOYD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS HEYER
Bryan Dickson v. US
as 19-6750
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOHN GILLEY, FEDERAL AGENT / CORRECTIONAL AGENT JOE DOE, 1 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
