Cases 1 - 10 of 14
A. Chaudry v. County of San Diego, et al
as 23-55034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A. WAHEED CHAUDRY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, TODD MCCRACKEN, LUZETTE WARNER and others
Brundage v. Butler et al
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Aramis Brundage
Defendant:
Rex L. Butler, Amy Elizabeth Miller and Andrew Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaudry v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2021cv01847
Plaintiff:
A. Waheed Chaudry
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Todd McCracken, Luzette Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
United States of America v. Ortiz Bonilla et al
as 1:2021cv00122
Defendant:
Ruth Elizabeth Miller Miller and Ramon Fernando Ortiz Bonilla
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Miller v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Miller
Defendant:
Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AmTrust International Underwriters Limited v. The Pass LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01486
Plaintiff:
AmTrust International Underwriters Limited
Defendant:
The Pass LLC , High Country Contractors, Inc, Global Construction Solutions, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mixdalia Taime et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09495
Plaintiff:
Tammy Clayton, Cheryl Dafford, Robert G. Dafford and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Aguilar v. Brazelton et al
as 3:2015cv02748
Petitioner:
Wilmer Aguilar
Respondent:
P. D. Brazelton and Susan Elizabeth Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv06088
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Miller
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elizabeth Miller v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-70581
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH MILLER, AKA Elizabeth Alidi
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
