Cases 1 - 10 of 26
PERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN ELIZABETH PERRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elizabeth Perry v. Jean Aidonis
as 21-1943
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH PERRY, Property Maintenance Code Official for Fairfax County, Virginia and LESLIE B. JOHNSON, Fairfax County Zoning Administrator
Defendant / Appellant:
JEAN J. AIDONIS
PERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09250
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Norfleet Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Quentin D. Campbell, Donald H. Rodgers and Norfleet Transportation, LLC
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry et al v. Aidonis
as 1:2020cv01236
Defendant:
Jean John Aidonis
Plaintiff:
Leslie B. Johnson and Elizabeth Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PERRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv18431
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PERRY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perri v. Vivint
as 2:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Vivint
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Perri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Capstar Bank v. Perry
as 3:2017cv01221
Plaintiff:
Capstar Bank
Defendant:
Elizabeth Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kabushiki Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku vs. Wolfe; et al.
as 1:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kabushiki Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku and Yugen Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku
Defendant:
Corrine K. R. Wolfe, Susan Hemmings, Elizabeth Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Perry v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03101
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Perry
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
