Cases 31 - 40 of 487
ELLIS v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2020cv05269
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
FREDERICK ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TWARDZIK v. DEVERO
as 2:2020cv04105
Plaintiff:
JASON TWARDZIK
Defendant:
OFFICER ELLIS DEVERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKOX v. TICE et al
as 3:2020cv00161
Defendant:
ZACHARY MOSLAK, MELANIE PYLE, ERIC TICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HICKOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. BOOCKVAR et al
as 2:2020cv03850
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, WILLIAM GILLIGAN, URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH and others
Defendant:
AL SCHMIDT, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BETHANY HALLAM and others
Intervenor:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Tradesmen International, LLC
as 3:2020cv01251
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Tradesmen International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS v. MERCK & CO., INC et al
as 2:2020cv02120
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK & CO., INC and MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WENGER v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01620
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC., individually and as successor in interest to TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH LLC f/k/a Teva Women's Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
ELLIE WENGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
