Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Mangum v. Beltz et al
as 0:2024cv01505
Petitioner:
Leonard Mangum
Respondent:
Tracy Beltz and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortymacknifisent v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Respondent:
Paul Schnell, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellison v. Lumpkin
as 24-10054
Petitioner:
Jacob Douglas Ellison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 1:2023cv04845
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Sullivan v. Tracy Beltz, et al
as 23-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Joseph Sullivan
Defendant / Appellee:
Tracy Beltz, Warden, Minnesota Dept. of Corrections, Faribault, MN and Keith M. Ellison, AG
Ellison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00544
Petitioner:
Jacob Douglas Ellison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellison v. Christensen
as 9:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Zonta Ellison
Respondent:
Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stafford, Bennie et al v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
Bennie Stafford and Debra Mitchell
Respondent:
Tony Evers, Wis.Attorney Gen. Josh Kaul, Wis. Chief U.S. Atty. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Turner v. Beltz et al
as 0:2023cv00559
Petitioner:
Jonathan Turner
Respondent:
Tracy Beltz and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
